TravelRisk: Dengue infections kill 55 people in Malaysia

Dozens die as dengue surges in Malaysia while vaccine uptake stalls

With 55 dead, medical experts warn that high costs, rather than vaccine hesitancy, are keeping uptake low amid the outbreak

Dengue fever is a virus spread through the bites of infected mosquitoes. Photo: Shutterstock
Dengue infections in Malaysia have surged 56.2 per cent this year, with 58,079 cases and 55 deaths recorded so far, even as take-up of the dengue vaccine remains low.

Dr Shanmuganathan TV Ganeson, president of the Federation of Private Medical Practitioners’ Associations, Malaysia, said cost was one factor behind the low vaccine uptake.

A two-dose regime could cost between 420 and 500 ringgit (US$104 to US$124), depending on the facility, and was generally cheaper in general practitioner clinics, he said, adding that GPs also lag larger facilities in terms of publicity.

The dengue vaccine also had to compete with other vaccines that were more affordable, he said, especially the flu vaccine.

“People here tend to opt for flu protection, especially travellers, which costs less than 100 ringgit, rather than an expensive dengue vaccine,” Shanmuganathan said.

He explained that the dengue vaccine could not be given to pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers or immunocompromised patients and was recommended only for those aged between four and 60.

Dengue Prevention Advocacy Malaysia co-chairman Professor Zamberi Sekawi said there was some hesitancy, as with other vaccines, but cautioned against reading the low uptake as anti-vaccine sentiment.

A pest control worker sprays insecticide to help control the spread of dengue fever carried by mosquitoes in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, in 2014. Photo: Reuters
A pest control worker sprays insecticide to help control the spread of dengue fever carried by mosquitoes in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, in 2014. Photo: Reuters

“The evidence suggests that many Malaysians are undecided rather than opposed. They want to know how effective the vaccine is, its long-term safety, and the recommendation of their doctor,” he said, adding that public awareness of the vaccine was limited.

“Cost and access must not be mistaken for hesitancy. Since we have to pay for it, it creates an additional barrier.”

He said studies had shown that acceptance of the vaccine improved when people understood its risks and when doctors themselves recommended the jab.

“We need better public education and, importantly, doctors who are confident enough to have personalised conversations about dengue prevention and vaccination,” he said.

Checks by local reporters on prices at various private facilities found that two doses of the dengue vaccine can cost up to 480 ringgit.

The Health Ministry said last year that it had no immediate plans to include the vaccine in the National Immunisation Programme.

High-risk regions

In a statement issued on Friday, the Health Ministry said the increase in cases was initially concentrated in the Klang Valley region, particularly Selangor state, as well as the federal territories of Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya.

“The risk of dengue transmission remains high and the national situation remains worrying following increases in cases now also detected in several other states,” it said.

Intensive, targeted prevention and control measures, including early case detection, vector control, outbreak management and personnel mobilisation, had since begun to show positive results, the ministry noted.

The northern state of Perlis recorded the highest percentage increase, up 207 per cent from 55 cases between January and August last year to 169 this year.

Johor’s cases more than doubled, climbing 109 per cent from 4,140 to 8,639, while Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya recorded a 106 per cent increase, from 5,013 to 10,316 cases.

Selangor continued to be the worst-affected state in absolute terms, with 25,090, up 61 per cent from 15,610 cases. Sabah recorded 3,753 cases, up 34 per cent from 2,806 previously.

Only Penang, Melaka and Kedah recorded reductions, with cases falling by 26 per cent, 36 per cent and 60 per cent, respectively.

The ministry attributed the rise in dengue cases to several factors, including weather favourable to mosquito breeding.

This article was first published by The Star
Reported by the South China Morning Post on 22 August 2026.

TravelRisk: Sydney Airport 4th Incident

Fourth Sydney Airport runway safety incident in almost as many weeks being investigated

Qantas plane on a runway with large buildings in the background.

A fourth incident has occurred at Sydney Airport. (ABC News: John Gunn)

In short:

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau is investigating a fourth safety incident at Sydney Airport in almost as many weeks.

A Qantas flight to Melbourne stopped after it was given permission to turn onto a taxiway where another plane was travelling to let them pass.

Airservices Australia says it will continue to review operational events and take any required to maintain safe operations.

TravelRisk: Personal Data Exposed in Hotel Cyber attack

Ascott’s Quest Apartment Hotels customers’ personal data exposed in security breach

A black sign reading "Quest, Potts Point" is seen against a brick wall. Two windows are behind it.

Quest Apartment Hotels says it is investigating a security breach that has affected customers’ personal data.

In an email to customers, seen by ABC News, Quest said the compromised data related to records from before June 2025 and included full names, email addresses and other contact details.

A small number of data entries also include customers’ date of birth.

“On Monday, 17 August 2026, we identified unauthorised access to a database system arising from a vulnerability through a third-party service provider,” a statement read.

“We immediately took steps to contain the incident and secure the affected systems. The incident has been contained.”

The company said it had notified the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner and the Australian Cyber Security Centre.

“We are very sorry this has happened and for any concern it may cause. Protecting the privacy and security of our customers is extremely important to us,” David Mansfield, managing director for Australasia at The Ascott Limited, said in the email to customers.

“We will contact you if our investigation identifies any further information that is relevant to you or if there are any additional steps you need to take.”

The company warned people not to click on unexpected links or to open attachments, even if they came from the hotel.

Social media users across Facebook and Reddit confirmed they received emails from Quest overnight.

The Ascott Limited owns Quest and other accommodation brands including Citadines and Oakwood, which operate in Australia and globally.

Reported on 19 August 2026 by ABC.

TravelRisk: Aircraft Instrument Failure

Screens Go Black: UPS Boeing 767 Lands In Denver Amid Dramatic Instrument Failure

UPS 767 Takeoff

Over the weekend, a Boeing 767-300 Freighter operating a domestic cargo flight for UPS Airlines had a more dramatic arrival into Denver than its crew might have been bargaining for, following a total instrument failure on approach to the Colorado hub. This forced the pilots to defer to the jet’s standby instruments, with which they were indeed able to successfully carry out a safe landing at Denver Airport.

Even so, this incident was clearly considered to be a serious one, given that, two days later, the aircraft involved in the instrument failure, N312UP, has yet to take off from Denver once again. While N312UP is one of UPS Airlines’ older examples of the Boeing 767-300 Freighter, the type as a whole is actually one of the newer models in the carrier’s fleet, and it continues to take deliveries of them today.

A Dramatic Descent Into Denver

UPS OKC DEN Flight MapCredit: Flightradar24

As seen in the map above, the flight involved was a domestic service from Will Rogers International Airport (OKC) in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma to Denver International (DEN) in the US state of Colorado. According to reporting on the matter by The Aviation Herald, it was numbered as 5X5806, with data made available by Flightradar24 showing that it left late and arrived even later due to a longer routing.

UPS Airlines Flight 5X5806 On Saturday, August 15, 2026
Per Flightradar24 Departure From Oklahoma City Arrival In Denver
Planned 7:48 PM 8:11 PM
Actual 8:19 PM 8:59 PM

The Aviation Herald’s coverage of the incident highlights the fact that the jet was on approach to Denver when it experienced a total instrument failure, with all of its Large Display Screens failing. These included the Primary Flight Display, Navigation Display, and the Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System. Thankfully, with the help of the jet’s standby instruments, the pilots executed a safe landing.

Still On The Ground

UPS 767 LandingCredit: Shutterstock

UPS Airlines flight 5X5806 touched down on the 12,000-foot (3,658 m) concrete-paved runway 35L at Denver International Airport at 8:59 PM on Saturday, August 15, 2026, one hour and 40 minutes after its initial departure from Oklahoma City. Almost two days later, the jet is yet to have operated another flight, with the instrument failure clearly being enough of a concern to remove it from service for now.

This represents a marked contrast compared to N312UP’s activity in the days leading up to its total instrument failure on approach to Denver International Airport. Indeed, UPS Airlines flight 5X5806 was its fourth flight of the day on Saturday, with the jet having already flown from Louisville (SDF) to Salt Lake City (SLC) early in the morning, followed by a service from Louisville to Oklahoma City later on.

Generally speaking, such a day at work is about standard, in terms of how N312UP’s operations have looked in the last week. For instance, August 11 was also a four-flight day, with the jet flying from Louisville to Richmond (RIC), Richmond to Philadelphia (PHL), Philadelphia to Ontario (ONT), and Ontario back to Louisville. August 12, 13, and 14 also each saw N312UP operate four internal flights.

The Aircraft In Question

UPS 767 InflightCredit: Flickr

As previously noted, the Boeing 767-300 Freighter operating UPS Airlines flight 5X5806 on Saturday, August 15, 2026, when it had a dramatic total instrument failure on approach to Denver, bore the registration N312UP. According to fleet data made available by ch-aviation, this widebody twinjet cargo aircraft is 29.83 years old, having first flown in October 1996. It was delivered to UPS the next month.

Since then, the jet has spent its entire working life with UPS under the same registration, with ch-aviation noting that its market value today sits just below the $26.5 million mark.

The Boeing 767-300F remains an important part of the UPS Airlines fleet today, with 95 units present at a relatively low average age of 14.9 years old (vs a fleet-wide mean of 26.3 years old). Another 12 units are set to be delivered to UPS.

Reported by SimpleFlying on 17 August 2026.

TravelRisk: cars burst into flames

They were told to park outside. Then their cars burst into flames.

Modern vehicles don’t need to be moving — or even turned on — to catch fire. That’s fueling lots of safety recalls and tough choices.

Late last year, when Sarah Lammersen learned her 2022 Jeep Wrangler plug-in hybrid was being recalled because the high-voltage battery could catch fire at any time — even when the vehicle was parked — she jokingly texted the dealership, “I hope the car doesn’t catch on fire while we wait to schedule an appointment.”

Days later, the Jeep burst into flames. No one was injured in the blaze, which occurred while Lammersen’s daughter drove the vehicle, but the Jeep was destroyed, according to a lawsuit over the incident.

That recall, covering more than 320,000 Jeep Wranglers and Grand Cherokees, notified owners about a fire risk so severe that they were “advised to park outside and away from structures and not to charge their vehicles until the remedy is completed.”

These “park outside” warnings have surged in recent years, growing from rare occurrences to include millions of vehicles.

An estimated 3.2 million vehicles nationwide currently have an outstanding “park outside” recall, according to vehicle history provider Carfax, which described the surging numbers as “concerning.”

The recalls also create new headaches for drivers, who suddenly wonder where it is safe to park their vehicles.

“Was it inconvenient? Sure. Ludicrous? Absolutely. It was a huge hassle,” said Steve Hawley of Lafayette, California, after he got a park-outside notice for his Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe.

Sean Kane, president of Safety Research and Strategies, which specializes in auto safety analysis, said he sees more vehicles are getting hit with the warnings.

“For consumers, there seems to be no easy choices,” Kane said. “Where are you going to park it?”

Standard safety recalls, which still make up the vast majority of formal notices, are usually thought of as being dangers tied to driving — brakes failing or air bags exploding.

But the risks covered by park-outside recalls don’t stop when the car is off.

They can pop up anytime.

That makes them a distinctive danger, experts said.

“It can be a giant disaster when cars catch fire and no one is there to see it,” said Michael Brooks, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety.

Elliot Conn, an attorney in San Francisco, said he usually deals with one vehicle-fire lawsuit at a time. Now, he has at least seven.

In December, a man walked into his garage in Fargo, North Dakota, and found his parked Hyundai Santa Fe was on fire. He later learned about a park-outside recall for his vehicle.

No one was hurt in that incident, but the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said it was aware of several injuries in recent years that appeared to be related to vehicle fires like this.

The rise in park-outside recalls is being driven by the growing number of electronics and batteries packed into modern vehicles, involving ordinary wiring, seat motors, starter relays, high-voltage batteries and more, according to experts.

They’re known as “key-off fires,” said Frank Borris, a former NHTSA investigator who now works as a safety consultant.

“The engine is off, but the circuits are still hot, and they stay hot all the time,” Borris said.

“There is a lot more electronics in vehicles today,” he added, “and that means more stuff can go wrong.”

Kane said vehicles today also run hotter and have more components packed tightly under the hood, providing more opportunities for fires to start.

“If something goes wrong, even if you park the car, the temperatures stay higher for longer than they used to,” he said.

This summer has been with flooded with park-outside recalls compared with previous years. Eight campaigns were announced in June and July alone, such as when NHTSA issued a notice, “Urgent Park Outside Warning Issued for 1 Million Jeeps,” blaming an electrical connection issue tied to power-steering pumps.

In the first seven months of 2026, there were 17 park-outside campaigns covering about 1.7 million vehicles, making this year among the busiest since NHTSA first created the park-outside designation more than a decade ago.

NHTSA created the park-outside designation in 2015 to grab people’s attention because the risk of an unexpected fire occurring in a building is “particularly severe,” the agency said in a statement.

It went further in 2022, adding a “park outside” warning box to its online recall lists to stress “the importance of the warning and increase completion rates,” the agency said.

But automakers can take months to offer up and distribute a recall solution, experts said.

That means some drivers could be living under park-outside warnings for a long time.

“What if you live in a condo with a parking garage? What are you going to do?” Kane said.

And then there are the vehicles with multiple problems.

Millions of Hyundai vehicles have been hit by park-outside recalls in recent years — and some of them were the same vehicles known to be especially easy to steal because they lacked anti-theft technology.

Kane said he heard from some Hyundai owners facing an impossible choice.

“I don’t want my house to burn down,” he recalled them telling him. “But I don’t want my car to get stolen. What am I supposed to do?”

Reported by The Washington Post on 17 August 2026.

TravelRisk: Flight Diversion – Emirates Passengers Stranded for over 10 hours in China

373 Passengers Stranded For 10+ Hours Without AC On Emirates A380 After Late-Night Diversion

An Emirates Airbus A380 carrying 373 passengers was diverted to Hangzhou Xiaoshan International Airport (HGH) after severe weather prevented its scheduled arrival at Shanghai Pudong International Airport (PVG), leaving those on board stranded inside the aircraft for more than 10 hours without functioning air conditioning.

The incident, involving Emirates Flight EK302 from Dubai, has drawn widespread attention after passengers described sweltering cabin conditions, lengthy delays in deplaning, and limited information while the aircraft remained parked overnight.

According to reports, the A380 landed safely in Hangzhou at approximately 9:00 PM local time on July 22 after thunderstorms disrupted operations at Shanghai Pudong International Airport. Although the diversion itself was not unusual, passengers remained on board until around 7:30 AM the following morning because border control and airport coordination delayed the deplaning process. Emirates has since apologized to affected customers, saying passenger welfare remained its priority throughout the event.

Weather Diversion Led To Overnight Delay

Flight tracking information shows EK302 diverted to Hangzhou after adverse weather made landing in Shanghai unsafe. Diversions are common during periods of intense thunderstorms, particularly at major international airports where runway capacity can quickly become constrained. After landing, however, the aircraft was unable to continue its journey or immediately disembark passengers.

Reports indicate Chinese border inspection procedures and airport operational requirements prevented the doors from being opened until immigration personnel arrived several hours later. Around 6:00 AM, passengers were informed they would need to remain on board until border officials completed the necessary arrangements, with deplaning beginning roughly three hours later. While extended ground delays following international diversions are uncommon, they can occur when airports are not prepared to process an unexpected international arrival outside normal operating procedures.

Passengers Describe Hot Cabin Conditions

Many passengers said the lengthy wait became increasingly uncomfortable because the aircraft’s air conditioning was reportedly not operating effectively while parked on the ground. Videos and photographs shared online showed travelers using handheld fans, fanning themselves with magazines, and gathering near open cabin areas in an effort to stay cool.

Several passengers told local media that cabin temperatures rose significantly during the overnight delay, with one traveler reportedly fainting before receiving assistance. Others criticized the limited communication during the wait, saying they received few updates about when they would be allowed to leave the aircraft. Although modern airliners can typically maintain cabin ventilation on the ground using auxiliary power units or airport ground equipment, prolonged delays, operational limitations, or equipment issues can affect cabin comfort depending on local circumstances.

The Operational Challenges Of Unplanned Diversions

Emirates A380 flying across clear skiesCredit: Shutterstock

Emirates apologized to customers affected by the disruption, acknowledging the extended delay and inconvenience experienced following the weather diversion. The airline reiterated that severe weather initially forced the flight away from its intended destination and that operational requirements at the diversion airport influenced how quickly passengers could be processed and continue their journeys.

The incident has also renewed discussion about lengthy onboard ground delays following international diversions. While airlines must comply with local customs, immigration, and airport procedures, extended periods without deplaning can create difficult conditions for passengers, particularly when cabin environmental systems are unable to maintain a comfortable temperature.

For Emirates, the diversion underscores how severe weather can trigger operational challenges that extend well beyond the flight itself. Although the Airbus A380 landed safely and the airline ultimately transported passengers onward, the more than 10-hour delay aboard the aircraft has become the focus of the incident and may prompt renewed scrutiny of contingency planning and passenger care during prolonged international diversions.

Reported on 28 July 2026 by Simpleflying.

TravelRisk: Window seats behind the engine

Ryanair Passenger Sucked Toward Broken Window After Midair Engine Failure

A Ryanair Boeing 737-800 flying from Thessaloniki Airport (SKG) in Greece to Memmingen Airport (FMM) in Germany had to return to its point of departure on Friday after debris from a dramatic engine failure caused damage to the aircraft’s window. The incident injured one of the plane’s passengers, with some reports suggesting that they were even partially sucked out of the broken window.

Despite the dramatic turn of inflight events, the flight’s pilots were able to safely land the aircraft back in Thessaloniki. Ryanair has since confirmed that the injured passenger received medical assistance upon arrival back in Greece, and the carrier also arranged a replacement aircraft in order to get the flight’s other guests back on their way with as little delay as possible.

A Dramatic Departure

Ryanair FR1879 MapCredit: Flightradar24

FR1879 is a regularly scheduled international commercial passenger flight that operates five times a week from Thessaloniki to Memmingen. According to tracking data from Flightradar24, Friday’s iteration was operated by a Malta Air Boeing 737-800 bearing registration 9H-QEU. It left Thessaloniki at 6:12 AM local time, 17 minutes after its scheduled departure of 5:55 AM.

However, as seen above, things took a dramatic turn when, as reported by Euronews, debris from an inflight engine failure hit and shattered a passenger window. This, The Mirror reports, injured the neck of a male passenger, whose head and shoulders were said to have been partially sucked out of the broken window. This prompted the flight to burn fuel and return to Thessaloniki. Ryanair confirmed the incident in a statement.

“A Ryanair flight from Thessaloniki to Memmingen returned to Thessaloniki shortly after takeoff when a passenger window dislodged inflight. The aircraft landed normally, and passengers returned to the terminal.”

A Replacement Aircraft Took Passengers To Memmingen With A Four-Hour Delay

A deeper dive into the data for this flight shows that it had reached an altitude of around 16,000 feet before it began to descend, at around 6:23 AM local time. It landed around 45 minutes later, at 7:08 AM, having burned off excess fuel to avoid an overweight landing. At this point, the injured passenger has been taken to the hospital, and the relevant authorities have now launched an investigation into the incident.

As the incident’s potential severity became clear, the flight’s pilots reportedly declared an emergency, prompting emergency services to meet the jet when it landed back in Thessaloniki. The plane ultimately landed safely, although oxygen masks did have to be deployed. The Aviation Herald also notes that passengers sitting in the row with the broken window had to be relocated.

As noted, Ryanair ultimately arranged a replacement aircraft to take the remaining passengers onward to Memmingen. A quick look at additional tracking data from Flightradar24 shows that this flight ultimately departed Thessaloniki at 10:03 AM and landed in Memmingen at 11:00 AM, just under four hours after the planned 7:10 AM arrival. The return leg was also delayed by around four hours.

Such Incidents Are Rare But Not Unheard Of

Southwest 737 Taxiing

While undoubtedly alarming, it is important to remember that such incidents are few and far between. Another notable example occurred in the US back in 2018, when debris from an engine failure burst a cabin window on Southwest Airlines flight 1380. This incident, which sadly resulted in the death of a female passenger, followed a similar engine failure on another Southwest flightin 2016

Of course, it isn’t just cabin windows that can be blown out inflight. Looking further back in time, a 1990 British Airways BAC 1-11 flight from Birmingham to Malaga made headlines worldwide after improperly installed bolts caused a cockpit window to blow out. The flight’s captain was sucked out of the cockpit and pinned to the nose for 20 minutes, but, incredibly, survived the ordeal.

Reported by Simpleflying on 10 July 2026.

Travel Risk Virus on Cruise – Passengers Stranded On Cruise Ship After Suspected Hantavirus Outbreak

Passengers are still onboard a cruise ship in the Atlantic Ocean, after three people died from what appears to be hantavirus—a rare type of zoonotic virus carried by rodents—as the World Health Organization works to evacuate two symptomatic crew members still on board.
CAPE VERDE-HEALTH-TOURISM
As of May 4, 2026, a suspected hantavirus outbreak on the expedition cruise ship MV Hondius in the Atlantic has resulted in three deaths and multiple illnesses.
One case has been confirmed, while others are suspected, prompting the ship (carrying 149 people) to anchor near Cape Verde pending medical evaluations for crew members experiencing respiratory symptoms.
Outbreak Details and Status

Location: The MV Hondius is currently anchored off Praia, Cape Verde, after traveling from Argentina towards the Canary Islands.

Impact: Three passengers have died, and others have shown symptoms of severe respiratory illness. One British passenger was evacuated to South Africa, where they tested positive for a hantavirus variant.

Cases: As of the latest reports, one case was laboratory-confirmed, with five other suspected cases (including two crew members).

Response: Passengers were instructed to remain in cabins while the vessel underwent sanitization, according to reports.

Hantavirus Context

Transmission: Hantaviruses are typically transmitted to humans through contact with rodent droppings or urine, particularly when the material becomes airborne. While human-to-human transmission is rare, it has been mentioned as a potential factor in this scenario.

Symptoms: Initial symptoms are flu-like—fever, chills, body aches, and headaches—which can progress rapidly to serious respiratory failure.

Risk: The World Health Organization (WHO) stated that the risk to the general public remains low.

Severity: Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome is highly fatal, with studies indicating a roughly 40% death rate.

Reported by Forbes on 4 May 2026.

Turbulence hits Delta flight during landing at Sydney Airport

Several injured as turbulence hits Delta flight into Sydney

Photo by James D. Morgan/Getty Images A Delta Airlines Airbus A-350 aircraft taxis on Sydney Airport's runwayPhoto by James D. Morgan/Getty Images
Delta Airlines said the Airbus A350 experienced “brief turbulence” as it landed at Sydney Airport

Several people have been injured after a Delta Airlines flight from Los Angeles to Sydney was hit by turbulence on Friday morning.

Delta Flight 41 “encountered brief turbulence” as it landed at Sydney Airport, an airline spokesperson told the BBC. Four flight attendants were injured, and no passengers were hurt, the airline said.

The New South Wales Ambulance Service said it assessed five patients in total, and took three to hospital with minor injuries that included back pain and headaches. The patients’ ages ranged from their 30s to 70s.

It is the latest incident of planes being hit by turbulence, with experts saying climate change is a major factor.

There were 245 passengers and 15 crew members on the Airbus A350, the Delta spokesperson said, adding that the plane landed “safely and normally” at Sydney Airport at 06:48 local time on Friday (19:48 GMT on Thursday).

The NSW Ambulance Service said it received a call just three minutes before the plane landed, and emergency vehicles were waiting on the tarmac.

Last year, 25 people were injured when a Delta Airlines flight, travelling from Salt Lake City to Amsterdam, hit “significant” turbulence just two hours into the long-haul flight, and had to make an emergency landing.

In 2024, passengers and crew on a Singapore Airlines flight experienced a terrifying five seconds of severe turbulence. One passenger died and dozens were injured, as those without seatbelts rose out of their seats and fell back down.

Turbulence is not uncommon during flights, and while cases of strong or severe turbulence seem to be rising, they are still very rare.

Estimates show that there are around 5,000 incidents of severe-or-greater turbulence every year, out of a total of more than 35 million flights that now take off globally.

Severe turbulence is defined as when the up and down movements of a plane going through disturbed air exert more than 1.5g-force on your body – enough to lift you out of your seat if you weren’t wearing a seatbelt.

As climate change shifts atmospheric conditions, experts warn that air travel could become bumpier: temperature changes and shifting wind patterns in the upper atmosphere are expected to increase the frequency and intensity of severe turbulence.

Reported by BBC on 20 March 2026

Melbourne Airport 2 Near Misses – “luck” that we didn’t have an impact

Malaysia Airlines A330, and Bamboo Airways 787 in near misses at Melbourne airport in 2023. Both aircraft took off only a few metres above runway workers at Melbourne airport.

Incidents were caused by flight crews’ insufficient understanding of take-off conditions, safety investigator says.

Incidents were caused by flight crews’ insufficient understanding of take-off conditions, safety investigator says. Photo Credit: Australian Transport Safety Bureau.

A failure of flight crews to fully understand take-off conditions almost led to two major accidents at Melbourne Airport in 2023, a safety investigation has found.

A Malaysia Airlines A330 bound for Kuala Lumpur, with 247 people on board, and a Bamboo Airways 787 departing for Ho Chi Minh City, with 212 people on board, both overran a shortened runway during take-off.

Both aircraft lifted off only metres above where night work was being carried out on the runway.

The safety inspector said the separate incidents were “very serious”, and were caused by flight crews’ insufficient understanding of take-off conditions.

“It was by luck in this case that we didn’t have an impact,” the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) said.

The runway had been shortened to accommodate resurfacing work and flight crew of both aircraft had been given the necessary take-off instructions, the safety investigator said.

Each aircraft reportedly took off past the limit of a shortened runway, resulting in “jet blast affecting … objects and people in the work area”, the ATSB noted.

The incidents took place within weeks of each other in September 2023.

ATSB said while the two airlines’ flight dispatchers had accounted for the reduced runway length in their calculations, they did not highlight the shortened runway to the flight crews for input into the plane’s flight management computers.

In both cases, flight crews used take-off calculations that expected a full runway length.

The Malaysia Airlines flight cleared the work crew by seven metres, while Vietnam’s Bamboo Airways flight passed over by 4.5 metres.

Reported on 12 November 2025 By Travel Weekly Asia